Is it for Humanity? civilians?
…as Mr. Obama crying out?
Why Libya? Is not humanity in more need in Japan today?
Do I see beyond?
Why they have always been in look out for opportunity to get involved in the affairs of oil rich countries?
History has the evidences…!
Iraq, Afganistan and now Libya.
Its simple…its OIL! The scarce hence the costliest resource on the planet earth.
Controlling oil resources has been on the priority list of American administration always. Geore W Bush-Senior, Geroge W Bush-Junior and now Mr. Obama.
Iraq is a glaring example of american neo imperialism
USA as we know it…is the self proclaimed may be the widely accepted sole super-power in the world. Reason, Imperialism…more correctly neo-imperialism. I hate this word. May be because I belong to a country which has been the victim of it for ages and though I am born to a free India I still feel like living under the shadows of imperialism! It has its effects…we lose whatever we call ours and moreover it leaves scars, of hatred, of sufferings, of suppressions!
Now lets come back to Libya! A civil war against the tyrant Md Gaddaffi all of a sudden has become an international affair. All of a sudden become a center of attraction for Mr. President.
“Gaddaffi must go…civilians must be protected”- US cries foul!
Is that it?
Is it not the oil rich country with abundant wealth that has seduced USA. Does not US has its own set of greed and of course ruthless selfishness to intervene in Libyan affairs? I feel so…
Obama faces criticism from his own mates too. No consent of American congress was taken before attacking Libya.
Political analysts note abundant signs that even before the Obama administration intervened in Libya, the American public had become weary of war. Polls suggest as many as two out of three Americans no longer believe America's involvement in Afghanistan is worth the cost.
Americans are likely to worry, that the United States will be stuck with part of the bill for rebuilding Libya, as it has been for Iraq, Afghanistan, and to a lesser extent in Pakistan and Egypt. And U.S. officials are still unsure if the anti-Gadafi forces are necessarily pro-America and pro-democracy. (Sources)
US cites UN approval but no resolution of the U.N. justifies violating the U.S. Constitution.
Then why?
I see one prominent reason behind!
Mr. Barack Hussain Obama, who is now serving US as the President for the third year has not been lived upto expectations. No promises are now seen being true and hence he gathered criticisms across the globe. The In October 2009, Obama was named the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize laureate, the same year he took over as the US President. But amidst thorough criticism and cynicism. May be now he wants to prove the worth of being a nobel laureate, may be trying to disguise the tyranny with a tag of an international peacemaker. The desperation has made him leave his mates behind!!
Reason two:
Political analysts say Obama could benefit politically if Gadafi is quickly ousted, or if the military effort to protect civilians and impose a no-fly zone produces a quick and relatively bloodless resolution. But if Kadafi clings to power in Tripoli, and the conflict degrades into a brutal stalemate, criticism is likely to mount.
Reasons may be abundant! But the US attack on Libya is unconstitutional and despicable. India regrets attacks…
Libya has never been a threat to US and attacking a sovereign country with guise of humanity and etc can not be justified by any reason.
Is it the start of US invasion into the Middle-East countries? Another episode of bloodshed and cruelty?
I am not advocating for Md Gadaffi…he is no innocent!
But I condemn the US attacks too! In no ethics bloodshed is acceptable! In no situation killing is admissible..
You can not stop violence with violence!
Hence I condemn it Mr. Obama…hope u too will one day!
No comments:
Post a Comment